Participation, Competition, and Rights of Colonels
Civic Kentucky Colonel Class
Under the civic model, Colonels are free—as citizens and honorees—to organize, publish, fundraise for their own projects, and create independent initiatives that celebrate the Kentucky Colonelcy, so long as they respect general law and the rights of others. Using “Kentucky Colonel(s)” descriptively in connection with registries, handbooks, historical websites, or civic projects is treated as a natural extension of their status and the public vocabulary surrounding the title.
Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Brand
Within a brand-centric framework, independent uses of “Kentucky Colonel(s)” in organizational names, domains, or services may be perceived as competitors to HOKC/KCC fundraising and merchandise. As a result, some Colonels who attempt to create alternative organizations, publications, or online communities using generic descriptive terminology can face trademark objections, enforcement demands, or contractual restraints designed to preserve HOKC’s market position.
Key Difference / Impact
The civic-class perspective views Colonels as having room to participate, innovate, and even compete in the public space of ideas, history, and civic projects using generic and descriptive references to their own title. The brand perspective tends to restrict that space, effectively discouraging Colonels from developing independent projects that might appear to “compete” with HOKC in philanthropy, public recognition, or narrative influence, even when those projects use generic terminology to describe the Kentucky Colonel Class rather than HOKC’s specific trademarks or trade dress.